I originally stated that Bell "propos[ed] setting aside $512,000" when in fact, Bell stated:

Graduating on time requires classes to be open. The solution is to shift resources to where the demand is. Part of ASUA's tuition plan this year includes a $512,000 set aside for class availability. If the proposal makes it through the Board of Regents, the job of next year's ASUA President will be to develop a mechanism that gives those funds to departments in need.

I apologize for and regret the error.

So now, the actual point of the first platform seems to be to "shift resources to where the demand is," which seems to make sense.

Still, it's not very well-worded, which is why I made the mistake in the first place.

The story is still developing, as it was inside word criticizing Mr. Bell that made me aware of the error in the first place. Developing...

Previous post: Original Analysis of Nathan Bell